CBK CORF Compliance
Meet the Central Bank of Kuwait (CBK) Cyber and Operational Resilience Framework (CORF) requirements with the Picus Autonomous Exposure Validation Platform. Test operational resilience against real cyber incident scenarios, validate prevention and detection controls, prove which exposures attackers can actually exploit, and build the verifiable evidence CBK expects for assessments, audits, Board reporting, and maturity progression.
What Is the CBK Cyber and Operational Resilience Framework (CORF)?
The Cyber and Operational Resilience Framework (CORF) is the cybersecurity and resilience regulation the Central Bank of Kuwait applies to the banks and financial institutions under its supervision. It replaces CBK's 2020 Cybersecurity Framework and moves the bar from foundational compliance to a resilience-first, maturity-oriented model.
The framework follows a "Safe-to-Fail" mindset. It assumes no system is immune to disruption and expects every Regulated Entity to prevent, absorb, recover from, and adapt to incidents.
What Are the CORF Baselines?
CORF requirements sit in three sets of Baselines: the Cyber Resilience Baselines (519 controls across 6 domains and 33 sub-domains), the Operational Resilience Baselines (146 controls), and the Third-Party Risk Management Baselines (211 controls).
The CORF Toolkit explains how they are applied. It holds the assessment criteria, a Statement of Applicability template, and maturity attributes from Level 1 (Initial) to Level 5 (Innovative) for every sub-domain.
Turn CORF requirements into tested, verifiable evidence with autonomous validation
Why CBK CORF Compliance Is Important
Kuwait's banks and financial institutions run services that customers and the wider economy rely on every day. Attacks against them are growing in frequency and complexity, while cloud, AI, outsourcing, and FinTech partnerships keep widening the attack surface. The CORF is CBK's answer: it assumes disruption will happen and expects every Regulated Entity to keep its critical services running through it.
Compliance also shapes how CBK sees an institution. Each requirement passes or fails on verifiable evidence, and the resulting maturity level feeds sector benchmarking, supervisory tiering, and regulatory prioritization. With the Board accountable for cyber resilience and spot checks possible at any time, a weak result carries regulatory and reputational weight far beyond a single assessment.
Security validation helps Regulated Entities turn these stakes into measurable progress:
Domain 4: Governance, Risk, and Compliance
Domain 5: Technology and Operations
Domain 9: Operational Resilience
CORF Toolkit
Benefits of Security Validation for CBK CORF Compliance
The Picus Platform helps CBK-regulated entities map how far an attacker could get, prove which exposures are exploitable, confirm that prevention and detection hold, and record every fix, giving them the evidence and maturity progress the CORF expects.
Picus Swarm agents, orchestrated by Numi AI, launch new attack simulations and penetration tests when assets change or a new threat emerges, covering the change triggers in CORF testing and red teaming controls between annual exercises.
Autonomous Penetration Testing and Exposure Validation confirm which vulnerabilities are exploitable, even on core banking and payment systems too critical to test live. The Picus Exposure Score ranks them by validated risk and asset criticality.
Run real attack techniques and check whether SIEM and EDR logged them and raised an alert. Detection Rule Validation flags rules with missing log sources, failed runs, or noisy output, each with insights and a re-check.
Breach and Attack Simulation meets the Level 4 expectation for BAS-driven control validation, and the Sense, Validate, Act loop of the Picus Platform delivers the CTEM program Level 5 describes.
CBK CORF Controls Supported by Picus Security
Below are the CORF control areas Picus supports, showing where it helps Regulated Entities validate their controls, exposures, and attack surfaces and build the evidence CBK assessors ask for.
A Practical Guide to CBK CORF Compliance Using Picus
CBK rates every CORF requirement on verifiable evidence. This guide maps Picus to the control areas behind resilience testing, penetration testing and red teaming, monitoring, vulnerability management, Board reporting, and audit, and shows how Regulated Entities can build a dated record of tested results ahead of their next assessment
Customer's Choice
2026 Gartner Peer Insights Voice of the Customer for Adversarial Exposure Validation
What Our Customers Say
Picus is very good attack simulation tool in overall. It shows all security vulnerabilities and guides..
Sr. Information Security & Risk Officer
The implementation was very fast, the platform is easy to integrate and results quite intuitive to be analyzed.
CIO
A very successful platform where we can test the accuracy of our security investments and see their scores.
Manager, IT Security and Risk Management
Picus is one of the best BAS solution on the market today. The threat database it is constantly updated..
ICT Security Engineer
There is a very nice team from which I can get quick support. The application provides us with great convenience and confidence in our work.
Information Security Specialist
With the help of this product we can perform continuosly endpoint attack via latest tactics and techniques which are used by threat actors..
Manager, IT Security and Risk Management
.. It is possible to customise the campaign or schedule the assessment periodically, to test protection measure implemented on network, endpoint and email.
ICT Security Engineer
Picus is such a great product for organizations that are looking to have constant checks and validation on their security posture in the organization.
Cybersecuirty Pre-sales Engineer
Picus is a real safety measurement tool. Ever since we took Picus into our inventory, Security has helped significantly to increase our maturity level.
Cyber Defense Senior Specialist
It strengthened our security perspective and allowed us to follow trend attacks. We can test zeroday malicious threats very early because Picus could add them their attack database quickly.
Security Specialist
Picus for Compliance
See the
Picus Security Validation Platform
Request a Demo
Submit a request and we'll share answers to your top security validation and exposure management questions.
Get Threat-ready
Simulate real-world cyber threats in minutes and see a holistic view of your security effectiveness.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBK CORF compliance means meeting the Cyber and Operational Resilience Framework issued by the Central Bank of Kuwait for the banks and financial institutions it supervises. The CORF replaces CBK's 2020 Cybersecurity Framework and combines cyber resilience, operational resilience, and third-party risk management requirements under one maturity-based model.
The CORF applies to all Regulated Entities under CBK supervision. CBK places each entity in a tier by risk profile: Tier 1 covers high-impact entities such as D-SIBs and Financial Market Infrastructures, Tier 2 covers mid-sized entities, and Tier 3 covers smaller ones. The Cyber Resilience Baselines also extend to employees, third-party vendors, and vendor staff serving the entity.
The CORF sets out 876 controls in three Baselines: 519 in the Cyber Resilience Baselines, 146 in the Operational Resilience Baselines, and 211 in the Third-Party Risk Management Baselines. Testing-related controls require penetration testing, red teaming, and resilience testing on a set schedule and again after significant changes in the environment or threat landscape.
Each requirement is rated Compliant, Non-Compliant, or Not Applicable based on documented, verifiable evidence, with no partial credit. Each sub-domain also receives a maturity level from 1 (Initial) to 5 (Innovative). A level counts only when the level below it is fully achieved.
CBK assesses Tier 1 entities every year, Tier 2 entities every eighteen months, and Tier 3 entities every two years. Any entity can also face spot checks and ad-hoc reviews at any time, so evidence must stay current between scheduled assessments.
For Cybersecurity Testing and Threat Management, Level 4 (Advanced) expects Breach and Attack Simulation tools to validate defensive controls continuously and exposures to be prioritized by asset criticality, adversary TTPs, and business impact. Level 5 (Innovative) expects a CTEM program that aligns testing, detection, and risk mitigation.
Security validation tests defenses the way an attacker would: it checks whether controls block or detect real attack techniques, maps the attack paths that lead to critical assets, and proves which exposures are actually exploitable. It turns periodic, document-based compliance into tested evidence, with time-stamped results, treatment decisions, and verified re-tests that CBK assessors, independent auditors, and the Board can review.
Picus combines Breach and Attack Simulation, Autonomous Penetration Testing, and Exposure Validation to test controls, map attack paths, and prove exploitability, including on systems too critical to test live. Each exposure ends in a Patch, Mitigate, Monitor, or Accept with Evidence decision with a verified re-test, and Numi AI orchestrates Picus Swarm agents to start new tests when the environment or threat landscape changes.

