Simulations provide a true reflection of your security posture. Results remain consistent across multiple simulations runs.
|
Cymulate
Simulations result lack integrity and provide false positives, which is pointed out by Cymulate’s customer statements. Simulation results also vary across simulation runs, undermining their reliability.
|
COMPARE YOUR OPTIONS
Picus Security vs Cymulate
Get immediate, accurate and actionable results instead of another complex tool to manage.
3 Reasons Why Customers Choose Picus over Cymulate
Picus validates your security controls and provides vendor-specific mitigation content for both the prevention and detection layers of your selected vendor's security controls. This helps you quickly address gaps and continuously optimize your security posture.
Cymulate's lack of vendor-specific mitigation and reliance on generic recommendations require extensive manual research on the client side, placing an operational burden on SOC and security teams and offering less overall value.
Threats
Picus Labs researchers ensure the rapid incorporation of emerging threats, adding them to the Picus Threat Library within 24 hours under a guaranteed SLA, provided there is a publicly available PoC. By focusing on threats highlighted in US-CERT and CISA alerts, this quick response keeps our clients' defenses up-to-date and highly responsive.
Cymulate's platform, on the other hand, lags in incorporating new threats, often taking days post-disclosure, which significantly decreases the objective of simulating these threats.
Picus is praised by our customers for its ease of implementation and operation. Integrating with your existing tools takes just a few clicks, and if assistance is needed, the Technical Assistance Center (TAC) team is just a call or email away.
In contrast, Cymulate poses challenges for particularly smaller security teams trying to leverage its full potential. Integrations are cumbersome to manage, and navigating the results requires significant expertise. Additionally, despite implementing broad, risky exclusions for the Cymulate agent, smooth coexistence with existing solutions is not guaranteed and compatibility issues may still arise.
Choose a Solution That Sets You Up For Success
With Picus, you minimize your threat exposure by automatically identifying critical prevention and detection gaps and getting the insights you need to mitigate them swiftly.
Picus
Cymulate
Simulation Accuracy
Actionable Insights
A mitigation library with over 80,000 vendor-specific mitigation content including prevention signatures, log source recommendations, and detection rules to deliver the most relevant and actionable simulations for SOC teams.
|
Cymulate
The lack of vendor-specific mitigation content, context, and guidance in the provided results means that sound expertise is required to derive actionable insights.Smaller security teams, in particular, struggle to get real value from using Cymulate. |
Response to Emerging Threats
The Picus Labs team is committed to researching the latest attack techniques observed in the wild and developing effective mitigation practices. As a result, newly emerging threats with publicly available PoCs are added to our platform within a 24-hour SLA. This rapid response, particularly for threats highlighted in US-CERT and CISA alerts, ensures our clients' defenses remain up-to-date and highly responsive. Picus Breach and Attack Simulation threat library provides more than 5700 real-world threats, comprising more than 24,000 attack actions covering all major OS families (Windows, Linux, macOS) as well as cloud-specific attack techniques. |
Cymulate
Cymulate's platform lags in incorporating new threats, often taking days post-disclosure. This diminishes the effectiveness of simulations as customers’ security gaps remain unaddressed during an active exploitation campaign.Even after incorporating the threat, customers need a paid subscription to access the 'immediate threats' module. |
Automate Detection Rule Maintenance
With Picus Detection Rule Validation, SOC/security teams can ensure detection rule health, verify log source coverage, and identify performance inefficiencies, eliminating the manual effort required for SIEM maintenance. Moreover, using AI-supported mapping of existing detection rules to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, security teams get a unique view on their detection coverage. |
Cymulate
Cymulate doesn’t provide this innovative capability, placing a significant burden of manual and resource-intensive maintenance on security teams. |
Customer Experience
"Picus offers a user-friendly interface and streamlined operational processes, significantly reducing the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highly appreciated by professionals in the field, as highlighted by a Network Security Engineer at a major bank who noted “Picus products have easy usage, great experience and efficient simulations. They have a great support team. Leading company.” |
Cymulate
Customer feedback highlights a significant usability challenge with Cymulate, indicating that the platform is not as intuitive or straightforward to navigate and operationalize as desired.
|
Seamless Integration with Existing Technology Stack
Picus seamlessly integrates with 50+ technologies including NGFW, WAF, EDR, SIEM, CTI, SOAR and more.Continued testing and fine-tuning ensures that Picus integrates well with existing EPP technologies, avoiding the exclusion of entire directories.By providing specific mitigation recommendations for a majority of these technologies, Picus helps you to increase the overall ROI of your existing security investments.
|
Cymulate
Many Cymulate users report issues with the integration of the platform into their environment. Despite implementing broad, risky exclusions for the Cymulate agent, smooth coexistence with existing solutions is not guaranteed.
|
Non Risky and More Reliable WAF Testing
Picus sends malicious payloads to its agents instead of customer's web applications, avoiding potential harm and ensuring performance stability.
|
Cymulate
Cymulate's approach of sending malicious payloads directly to customers' web applications can potentially damage these applications, risking denial of service and performance issues.Moreover, since the payloads are sent directly to the web application itself, the simulation results are not only affected by the WAF's response but also by the web application and the server, thereby compromising the reliability of the simulation.
|
Actionability of Threat Intelligence (TI)
Picus offers threat templates based on an organization’s sector, country, and region, utilizing Threat Intelligence. Additionally, Picus filters results to match threats identified through the organization's third-party CTI integrations
|
Cymulate
Cymulate faces challenges in making TI actionable for users. Absence of TI-led attack templates.
|
More Accurate MITRE ATT&CK Simulations and Heatmap
Picus ensures that each simulated ATT&CK technique is based on the specific Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) associated with that technique, rather than merely simulating the writing of a known malicious file to disk and generalizing this to assume that all related techniques to the malicious file are also blocked.
|
Cymulate
Cymulate’s approach to simulating MITRE ATT&CK techniques involves significant oversimplification by equating the prevention of a "known malicious file written to disk" with blocking all associated ATT&CK techniques of that file. For example, if a malicious file contains 40 TTPs, preventing its download is mistakenly considered as preventing all 40 TTPs. This creates a serious problem, leading to a false sense of security.
|
Always Up-to-Date MITRE ATT&CK Heatmap
Picus continuously updates its MITRE ATT&CK heatmap to include only current and relevant techniques, ensuring accurate and up-to-date security insights
|
Cymulate
Cymulate's MITRE ATT&CK heatmap includes deprecated techniques, which were outdated years ago. This inclusion of obsolete methods questions the relevance and accuracy of the ATT&CK coverage measurement.
|
Data Residency
Picus will always respect your data!You decide where your data resides, be it in the secured Picus environment or your own on premise with easy deployment or cloud environment. In either case, logs from your systems are always analyzed locally and never exported to the cloud.
|
Cymulate
Cymulate’s on-premise option is only available with a complex and costly workaround.In addition, Cymulate only provides limited support for on-prem deployments, eliminating a lot of use cases in regulated industries. |
Pricing Model
A variety of bundles allow for a simple buying experience tailored to your use case.
|
Cymulate
Cymulate’s pricing includes separate charges for every module, for simulation agents, for emerging threats and professional service hours; leaving you feeling nickel-and-dimed.
|
Our value
Elevate Your Cybersecurity Defenses: Experience Unmatched Security Validation
Discover how Picus outperforms the competition and empowers SOC teams with comprehensive security validation and actionable insights. Take charge of your cybersecurity future and experience the difference with Picus. Request your demo now and see how Picus stands as the ultimate choice against Cymulate!
What Our Customers Say
''Although we always used pen-test and other assessment practices, none of them gave us the depth and width we need to understand our security posture against the possible attack scenarios extensively. The Picus Platform was a game changer.''
The right hand of our security team
''The Picus Platform is an easy to use solution that helps us ensure our defenses keep pace with evolving threats.
Picus has become the right hand of our security team.''
Best choice for attack simulation
''With an expert support team, fully automated attacks, and detailed dashboards, The Picus Platform is the best choice for attack simulation.''
RESOURCES
Discover Our Latest News and Content